More Thoughts on the Creationist Museum

As Watt mentioned in an earlier post, there is now a museum dedicated to the creationist view of the universe, because apparently fundamentalists feel they need to provide a rebuttal to observable information and evidence in the world around them. I have a few thoughts of my own to add to Watt’s assessment.


(Image courtesy Ed Reinke / AP, via MSNBC)

An exhibit depicting two archaeologists coming to very different conclusions while unearthing the same skeleton is part of what will become the Creation Museum, now under construction.

The first is thinking “hey, a dinosaur! Incredible! Judging by how deep we found it, it must be millions of years old. I’ll have to do some additional testing on this. I think it might actually be an as-yet-undiscovered species.” The other is thinking “GOD DID THIS”. Then he points at a tree and says “GOD DID THIS”. Then he takes a breath and thinks “GOD DID THIS”. Then he checks his watch and thinks “GOD DID THIS”. Then he gets into his car and thinks “GOD DID THIS”. Then he gets home, turns on the TV, watches The Simple Life and thinks “GOD DID THIS”. Then he gets into bed, and as he drifts off to sleep, he thinks “GOD DID THIS”. Though, I’m a little confused: Why would an archaeologist draw a definite conclusion upon immediately finding a fossil in the first place?

Oh, by the way, apparently God is capable of creating something as complex as a thinking organism formed from instructions in microscopic organic chemicals we refer to as DNA, but he’s just too fucking retarded to think up evolution. Because, uh… it… says so in the Bible? Wait, hold on… nope, never mind, there’s nothing in the Bible about evolution. Oops! Well, by all indications, conservative Christianity has nothing to do with the Bible anyway. They claim the contradiction lies in the literal interpretation of Genesis. Of course, it’s pretty much the only part of the Bible they try to take literally, and apparently there’s no way this particular portion could be taken metaphorically.

“Americans just aren’t gullible enough to believe that they came from a fish,” he said.

Yet they’re gullible enough to believe they were fully-formed from magic by a giant man on a cloud and lured by a talking snake to eat an apple that made them aware and ashamed of the concept of nudity and were thusly cast out of a magical cornucopia garden and condemned to burn for eternity for becoming intelligent, and that all of humanity is the product of generations of profound incest? Okay!

What’s so hilarious about this is that these “Christians”, instead of actually, y’know, following the message of Jesus, have instead devoted themselves and their resources to this bullshit minutiae. As Watt pointed out, “I’m sure if Jesus had $27 million, this is what he would spend it on.” What Would Jesus Do? Would he spend $27 million on the poor, or on trying to convince people that the literal interpretation of Genesis was an accurate account? Hey, I know! Why don’t these shit-sneezing anal prolapses actually read the fucking Bible and find out?

“A Child Needs a Mother and a Father”

Getting married was the worst decision my mom ever made–unfortunately she made it four times. I have had, over the years, a biological mom, a step mom, a biological father, step father, adoptive father, and more nannies than I can count (not because my counting skills are bad, but because I had most of them when I was too young to remember.)

These people came in and out of my life not because my mother wanted to make things confusing, but because she had been indoctrinated to believe that “a child needs a mother and a father.” It’s a phrase with the lovely ability to attack both single parents and homosexuals at once, without sounding bigoted — oh, we’re not bigots, we just have the interests of the children at heart — and much of the country accepts it as true without a second thought.

You can probably guess already that I think this is bullshit. Primarily because I’ve lived it and know for a fact that it’s untrue. As much as I love my father (the adoptive one is the only one I consider my father,) my mother and I were better off without him. My family was almost destroyed because of my mother’s well-intentioned quest to provide me with a father.

It’s no secret that conservatives fear diversity. Familial diversity is just one more aspect of that. Conservative ideology does not accept that there could be more than one way of doing things correctly; conservatives exert great amounts of energy trying to convince or compel everyone else do things exactly the same way they do them (or would if they followed their own precepts.) So because some people have a religious opposition to abortion, my religious views on the matter are irrelevant. Because some people believe homosexuality is a sin, gay marriage should be illegal for everyone, regardless of beliefs.

One Size Fits All does not fit all. The quality of a family is not determined by the ratio of penises and vaginas. The quality of a family is determined by the quality of the relationships within it. A mother and child who love each other dearly and have a healthy relationship are a better family than a mother and father who hate each other but stay together ‘for the children’ and their kid. And I’ve met dozens of gays and lesbians who’d make better parents than most of the folks who’ve played that role in my life. Even if you do think homosexuality is a sin, I can think of a hell of a lot of sins which are worse for kids than stuff which has absolutely nothing to do with parenting — like sending your kid to school with crappy lunches — now that should be a sin.

Family is what you make of it — no more, no less. We construct them out of many things — blood, law, friendship — but in the end, the particular genitalia of the individuals involved is highly irrelevant.

Chick in 3D

It seems fundies are no longer content to keep their dinosaur/human coexistence fantasies printed on dead trees. They have now constructed a museum to depict a literal interpretation of the book of genesis, with some other tidbits thrown in (hey, someone has to read between the lines).

LIKE many modern museums, the newest US tourist attraction includes some awesome exhibits – roaring dinosaurs and a life-sized ship.

But only at the Creation Museum in Kentucky do the dinosaurs sail on the ship – Noah’s Ark, to be precise.

In addition to seafaring dinos, the museum will show how the grand canyon was formed in a couple days and that all people are a result of Cain’s incestuous behavior. I’m sure if Jesus had $27 million, this is what he would spend it on. The scariest part of the whole article is the last two sentences.

Update Meta-Post

Thanks to Alec and Infidel753 for providing content last week while I had family in town. It helped a lot. Sorry, everyone, for the absence of a Chick Dissection this past weekend — I was busy nearly all last week, and Djur didn’t get a chance to finish his guest Dissection of “Angels?”. There will be one for sure at the end of this week, with more regular content starting up again tomorrow. You’ll also possibly (hopefully) be introduced to another new writer.

I forgot to mention this before, but users are now able to register accounts. Click on “Login” over on the left and you’ll be taken to a WordPress screen that’ll let you set up an account. I’m not entirely sure what I’m going to do with this yet, but I have something sort of planned that could turn out to be really interesting. I encourage you all to register, and I’ll have it all worked out at some point in the near future.

The list of links down below the nav on the lower left has changed a bit. There are a lot of great new sites added, so go and check them out.

Meanwhile, I’ve started writing a non-fiction book about politics, which I will hopefully be eventually co-authoring with Alec. I’ll keep you all posted.

Stay tuned, and tell your friends.

Getting Our Vision Back

The people I hate most in this world are those who lament social problems but scorn politics and government in general, because they represent the exact damn reason those social problems exist.

For the love of God, racism doesn’t just decide to go away. It goes away when we force it to – and the only way WE can do anything is through political action and government. ‘We’ is government by definition.

Of course, if you’ve uncritically absorbed the big corporate anti-government talking point that all politicians are basically instruments for collecting money from special interests (TV commentators making a big splashy show of stuff like the evil, evil ACLU and MoveOn funneling money to candidates… and quietly sweeping the fact of many politicians being beholden to media largesse aside). Not only have candidates for office and their backers largely conceded to this view of government, but the public has as well.

Politicians aren’t competing pretty-boys and politics isn’t dueling special-interest talking points. Government isn’t some kind of sport; I’m not watching it because I’m the equivalent of a soccer fan. I can’t dispassionately look back and say ‘at the end of the day, there are more important things’, because there is nothing more important than the way people choose to govern themselves.

The frustrating thing is that a lot of the left wing’s natural audience is especially guilty of this. There’s a well-entrenched belief – a direct product of anti-government shitheels that shows up everywhere neoconservatives are trying to destroy civil society – in Big Corruption.

Big Corruption is a fucking myth, and the worst fucking myth. It’s the pervasive belief that government represents an onerous burden because its human actors have an interest in making the lives of those who they ostensibly serve miserable. It’s the same belief system that makes people on the right earnestly gibber about ‘welfare pimps’ whenever they see a black man in a suit on TV. The problem is, the right wing noise-makers have learned to tug at the pants-pissers’ fear strings hard enough that they’ll hold their nose however hard they need to to vote for their candidate.

Meanwhile, the left wing has no countervailing force for that. We’ve lost our vision – we’re blind on cynicism, so hyper-critical that we can find compelling good in nothing. By absorbing the long train of assertions that beneath the veneer of progressive talk invariably lies money-grubbing corruption, we’ve managed to turn the most important damn thing in the world into something like a football game.

Now, if we were consistent about that it’d be one thing. But the problem is that you can’t turn off your conscience – not without a lot of financial incentive, anyhow – and more often than not, the same people who windmill beltway politics-as-usual producing Tweedledee and Tweedledum proceed to change their minds when it becomes clear Tweedledee is Hitler and Tweedledum is merely Schuschnigg – usually a week before the damn election.

This is why we have repeatedly found ourselves in the loathsome position of cheering on toads like Clinton, Gore, and Kerry – they’re the Schuschnigg of the equation. While we’re ostensibly a part of the primary process, we ruthlessly shut ourselves out of pre-election electoral politics. The ‘mainstream’ Democrats, who are basically Republicans who got passed over too many times at the trough, who use phrases like ‘moderation’ and ‘triangulation’ and ‘bipartisanship’ to dress up the fact they’re proud of being the Tweedledum to the other side’s Tweedledee – they’re all too happy to play along. They make as if Kucinich or anyone else to the left of Richard Nixon is a joke, and we exercise a sort of joy in furnishing them with the punchline – registering under an obscure party or as an ‘independent’ or simply not bothering with the primary at all.

The thing is, while the ‘mainstream’ crowd does indeed represent the safest investment for political money, the ugly secret of Washington is that you bet on every horse you can afford to. Wal-Mart gave the maximum contribution to the campaigns of John Kerry and George W. Bush; in fact, the way PACs work, it’d be a fairly profound insult not to throw a few thousand bucks a candidate’s way.

Unless we are an active part of the electoral politics of the Democrats, the fifth column among them – the careerist corporate puppets and other exploiters of left-wing cynicism about democracy – the actively ethical candidates will look like broken-down old mares again and again, and with every election we’ll have to vote for a more and more right-wing Tweedledum – while claiming we’re just too damn cool to have voted and trying to suppress nightmares as mankind goes down in flames.

And at the very least, we can never buy into the old awful propaganda about what Americans want. The media represents the mainstream as supporting continuing war in Iraq, faith-based initiatives, free trade, and tax cuts – and being bitterly divided over the prospect of war with Iran. They haul Steve Forbes and other vampires on every once and a while to pretend as if Flat Tax or FairTax or whatever else actually has a support base.

A survey once found that around 3/4 of Americans queried earnestly believed that ‘to each according to his ability, from each according to his need’ was in the Constitution – and only slightly fewer did not consider it a just maxim for government. At this point, around 70% of Americans want the war in Iraq to end this year. The right wing has a fundamental disconnect with everyone except themselves – but they know fear very well, governed as they are by it, and they’ll exploit it whenever humanly possible.

However, their answers to fear are hollow and self-centered – not ones that most people accept. The fear of starvation and death is a universal one – but only about a third of the population is willing to buy that the answer to that fear is to simplify the tax code and stock up on ammo. The rest of us, the people we stand shoulder-to-shoulder with, are more God-damn Marxist than I am. The only difference is that they haven’t been taught what that means – they have better things to worry about.

Now, if someone had a national television to make things like the benefits of welfare and free education a serious priority – well, that’d make a lot of difference, wouldn’t it?

The best chance we have for making a difference in America is by clubbing the DNC and their allies like so many baby seals – and showing the American people the boldness and vision we’ve been depriving them since Reagan.

Electoral politics are painful and ugly – but we’ve got to get into them again. The prospect of Biden and Giuliani fighting for the privilege of holding onto The Button as American civil society and welfare rot – why the hell would we even consider allowing that without a fight? The answer isn’t to drop out of the system – if any of us is to leave politics, it ought damn well to be burning out. We need to get our vision back and stop trying so damn hard to pretend that we don’t have the power to make a difference. It says a lot about us that left-wing revolution, a serious threat in the time of even fairly liberal FDR, has become a running joke.

It’s about damn time we give the right wing what they want so bad – cause to fear us again.

Unnatural Sexual Behavior

Those who seek to denounce some particular form of sexual behavior often like to brand it as “unnatural”, basically meaning that it does not exist in nature — that is, among non-human animals — and thus cannot be normal for humans either. Oddly, the people who do this often tend to be those who reject evolution and thus do not believe that we are related to the other animals, but let that pass.

In most cases, in fact, it’s not true. Animal sexual behavior is very varied, and unsurprisingly, it’s our fellow mammals who tend to be the most imaginative. Masturbation, promiscuity (in both genders), oral sex, foreplay, incest, rape, homosexuality (in both genders), erotic dances to whip up a partner’s interest, sexual play among adolescents, and even lifelong commitment to a single partner — all these things have been observed among other mammal species and are common enough in at least some to qualify as normal behavior for them. (Note too that a couple of these examples remind us that blindly taking what occurs in nature as a guideline for what should be acceptable among humans would be rather dangerous.)

But there is one form of human sex-related behavior (indeed, one which the moralists consider an essential prerequisite to sex of any kind) which has no counterpart in nature. It’s marriage.

No naturalist studying any species on Earth has ever reported a case in which two animals who wanted to mate with each other insisted on finding a third animal to stand around reciting mumbo-jumbo at them first. Only humans do that.

Personally I’ve always found the concept of marriage somewhat insulting. Its underlying assumption seems to be that the feelings a man and woman have for each other are not enough in themselves, and need to be “legitimized” by bringing a third party — the church, the government — into the relationship to provide its stamp of approval.

In fact, if people feel motivated to be monogamous, they will be, with or without a piece of paper from the church or the state. And if they don’t feel motivated, the piece of paper probably won’t help.

Others are entitled to their own views, of course. But denunciations of behavior as “unnatural” are impossible to take seriously — especially when the one practice which has no counterpart in nature is upheld as normative.

The Life And Times Of Baby K

Baby K was born to a fundamentalist mother. This is a true story, and while the mother preferred that she remain anonymous, because of its portentous impact on bioethics and the high profile of her case, she is known as Ms. H and the baby as Baby K for the sake of identifying both.

Until now, I have not done with the semantics what I ought to: put ‘mother’, ‘baby’, and ‘born’ in quotes. Baby K was anencephalic – born without a brain, or indeed any cerebral tissue above the brainstem.

Anencephaly is inevitably fatal, and is an open-and-shut case of futile care. There is absolutely no way that a fetus that fails to develop a forebrain – along with all the manifold receptors and regulators for various hormones, the center of consciousness and everything – will survive long. Most are aborted – over 95% – and the few that are carried to term owing to absurd ‘religious’ convictions – their own or someone else’s (in spite of pretty much every major religion rejecting the preposterous idea that a wise and just God would invest a soul in such a creature) – or hardship (Ask Me About Socialized Medicine.)… well, they don’t survive long. Even palliative care (care intended to reduce suffering and render comfort for those whose death is imminent – oppose aggressive clinical care, which seeks to cure the condition that the patient suffers above all else) is fairly controversial in the case of anencephalic births. You can literally see the ‘child”s naked spinal cord at birth – there is an unobstructed view where their scalp should be – what the hell purpose is there in feeding or watering that?

I mean, we water plants, but that’s mostly because we derive pleasure from keeping them alive in spite of their lives being more mechanical than ethical.

Which brings us to the strange and sad case of Baby K. In order to pretend that she had given birth to a child instead of a twisted monstrosity, Ms. H stridently insisted that God had invested Baby K with a soul and it was God’s responsibility rather than that of any doctor or even herself to decide when Baby K would ‘die’. Her batshit convictions lead her to decide that the little horror that had formed in her womb was as fully human as anyone around her.

This is where the story takes on a peculiarly familiar tone. Ms. H was not only wasting state resources; a strictly utilitarian calculus, after all, is deeply unsatisfying when it comes to matters like this. (Note that I say ‘like this’ – in this case, it is perfectly satisfying to conclude that nothing actually makes the lump of malformed flesh alive in any real sense and that there is no obligation on the behalf of the state to spend time or money on its care.) But we’ll get to that later; the fact of the matter is she simply inflicted on everyone concerned, among them professionals only doing their jobs in an unrewarding field, to bear Baby K to term.

Seem familiar? If you recognize Terri Schiavo here, congratulations on having better neurological capacity than Baby K. The same mentality went into declaring a creature with the face of a woman, the brain mass of a housecat, and the neurological activity of a bean sprout a human being. It’s tempting, but hyperbolic, to say there’s no consistency there; that the fundamentalist movement in fact lacks any element of intellectual rigor or coherence. Tempting, but incorrect.

That consistency lies in their self-absorption.

There’s a very good reason that so many ‘fundamentalist’ Christians insist on a scatter-brained and ridiculous reading of the Bible that asserts the Sermon on the Mount, a proto-socialist screed and a direct rejection of comfortable life in civilized society, only applies after the Second Coming. Hell, they reject the most basic forms of charity, common to all moral people, as ‘fostering dependence’ or ‘enabling’, leaning on absurd formulas like ‘a hand up, not a handout’. The same reason governs the fact that there’s a disproportionately Christian influence among tax-evaders who pretend that historical, legalistic, or philosophical conspiracy theory enables them to find a certain syntactic formula to exempt them from the most basic duty to society. It’s the same attitude that causes Pat Robertson to squint hard as he prays so everyone will know how Christian he is and send lots and lots of money.

It is why televangelists die so damn rich; it is how the preposterous Prosperity Gospel exists, and it is why The Secret’s hawkers can honestly pretend that Jesus was a millionaire and that he was a prosperity teacher and with his teachings you can get rich too.

The basic truth behind ‘fundamentalism’ in America is the basic truth of capitalism: look out for Number One and to hell with everyone else. In this case, Ms. H was made aware that ‘Baby’ K was anencephalic long before it was due – long before the normal cutoff for termination of pregnancy – and owing to the extenuating circumstances abortion would have been an option even later than it normally is. The normal moral issues of abortion are almost never considered to apply in cephalic disorders, precisely because the ‘life’ of the ‘child’ isn’t even theoretically a valid concern – there ain’t anything about an anencephalic fetus that you can call alive unless you’re a really enthusiastic cardiologist.

In light of all that, think about Ms. K’s position. She didn’t just make an impulsive choice in the heat of the moment; she had time to meditate on her actions and chose to carry the hideous lump of humanoid flesh inside her to term. Then, when it had emerged in all its glory – by some awful accident with its vital functions up and running and its brainstem functioning – she decided she wanted to play mommy. So she expected the hospital to keep Baby K alive, at its own time and expense.

For some ridiculous reason, the court actually agreed with her – applying inappropriately the standards of care for pneumonia (which the ‘infant’, not having the capacity to continue breathing for prolonged periods independently, had symptoms of) where anencephaly serves as a clear mitigating factor for the relevance of those standards. It’s like suing someone for breach of contract when they break the code of conduct in fleeing their burning apartment building.

The state of Virginia played along, and she got to live in a sick little Christian fantasy world where she got to be the mommy of a living baby every bit as human as everyone else.

Including the nurses that she forced to give Baby K respiratory care – something that a ‘child’ without a Goddamn cerebellum regularly requires. And owing to the wonders of modern medicine and the peculiar cruelty of fate, Baby K survived for two and a half years.

For two and a half years, a long train of nurses, technicians, doctors, and other professionals had to service the needs of a horrific parody of human life. That’s trauma 101, buddy – having to intubate and sustain a living breathing thing with a concave brainpan, trying in futility for hours to look away from its little eyes – almost like the dozens of pairs of eyes most people have seen, in the form of siblings and cousins and friends’ children and even their own, in healthy babies.

Every night after the nurses and doctors to deal with Baby K had to contend with a day spent staring into those hideous dead eyes, a sort of cruel mockery of everything we hold dear. Something deep in us, hard-wired since the Triassic, demands that we attend to our young and find them more precious than anything. A sort of fundamental, irrational repugnance attaches itself to the very concept of nonviability in infants.

Consider Harlequin Fetus. (I know you don’t want to.) You’re on the Internet, which means you’ve probably seen the picture of a man distending his asshole so big he can fit in a football lengthwise. People joke about that all the time. I find it funny, and you’ve at least made your peace with it if you’re in our audience. There are less funny things out there that people joke about, still find funny. What they used to call ‘suitcase hentai’ and now refer to by its proper Japanese name, guro: schoolgirls chopped into little pieces. Weightlifters suffering hideous and extremely conspicuous anal prolapse. Budd Dwyer’s face twisting into a grin the moment after his last, nose bleeding with a new lead toupee. A matador with a bull’s horn up his ass. Hitler jokes.

They’re all hilarious to us.

But so few people will joke in all seriousness about Harlequin Fetus, even people who are completely cavalier about human life. They are not comfortable in its presence, because there is something about infancy that does not permit the horrific.

My father is horribly indecent – good man, but awful. He’s gotten his fellow doctors to alternate between laughter and horror at stuff like using a guy’s severed calf as an impromptu hand puppet; he can go through little old ladies dying on him and still laugh and joke at dinner the same day.

But when he does pediatric trauma, he doesn’t want to get out of bed in the morning.

So Ms. H abused dozens of people who were only doing their damn job – not a glamorous one, or one that paid well, and one in which they normally would see this kind of truly awful shit only a few times in their entire career – for the sole benefit of keeping the little monstrous meatwad growing inside her breathing, pretending it was a real baby and making as if she was a real mommy. She took it to court, made the state spend money defending its wish not to expend money or time or energy on Baby K’s ludicrously futile care.

And she is now proud of herself. She believes she fought the good fight here, that she was in the moral right to viciously and remorselessly shit in dozens of innocent people’s nests for her own idle and idiotic pleasure. She and her supporters believe that their ’cause’ is a sacred one vindicated by history.

Only months before Baby K’s futile heart at last ceased its terrible beating, Newt Gingrich was inaugurated as Speaker of the House.

Erf.

This week’s Chick Dissection is going to be a day or two late, as we have guests visiting. Keep an eye out. Sorry.

Reviews | Spider-Man 3 – Movie and Game

The Movie

Though many claim the number of villains in this film detracted from the overall composition and convoluted the plot, I’m inclined to disagree. I’d have preferred if they’d added at least one more, even, if it meant trimming down all the immature, needless, melodramatic quarreling between Peter and Mary Jane. These scenes were like what middle schoolers scrawl in their diaries about what they feel human emotional interactions are supposed to be like.

Three times in the movie, Mary Jane erupts at Peter because of his attempts to illustrate why he feels he can sympathize with what she’s going through by relating her experiences to his own. Even though she’s fully justified the third time, the first two are roughly the equivalent of: “Ow, goddammit, I broke my leg! Holy shit, does that ever hurt! Peter, I could use some emotional support, here!” “You’re going to be okay, trust me. I broke my leg once, and it healed up pretty quickly. Hurts a lot when it first breaks, but after they get you set up with a cast, you’ll be fine.” “IT’S ALWAYS ABOUT YOU, ISN’T IT? THIS ISN’T ABOUT YOU, PETER, IT’S ABOUT ME, AND UNTIL YOU CAN UNDERSTAND THAT, I’M NOT SURE WHERE I STAND WITH YOU!” Only, instead of her actually mentioning breaking her leg to him, she hides it from him and expects him to figure out how to comfort her, telling him only “I feel bad, you have no idea what it’s like”. Seriously. I’m not kidding. It’s just like that.

Given the caliber of the writing, it’s no surprise that lack of substance was padded out with sheer quantity. While the number of characters did indeed detract a little from the individual character development for each, again examining the quality of writing I’m not really sure if getting rid of one or two would’ve made things any better. Likely, you’d have wound up with a bunch of scenes where Eddie Brock and Peter have dinner together to have a big, melodramatic discussion about the fact that Peter doesn’t seem to care enough about Eddie’s career, or where the Sandman sings at Spider-Man in the jazz club to explain about his sick daughter.

Speaking of singing: I’ve enjoyed Kirsten Dunst in many things, especially Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. Though she’s no Michael Caine or anything, her acting skills are definitely worthy of the screen. Unfortunately, I can’t say the same for her singing voice. It’s not that she’s necessarily bad at it, it’s just that she’s mediocre to an extent that it brings nothing to the film to have her sing. One can only wonder why they devoted so much screen time to it — she either has an agent who adores her, or an agent who has a deep, salty hatred for all film audiences everywhere. While needlessly wading through her earlier musical number (yes, there are more than one) as the film laboriously churned itself into running through an overlong and needlessly expository introduction that triggered the “I’m going to dislike this film” sensor way too early, I almost felt embarrassed for every person sitting in the theater, myself included, likely drawn into a kind of empathy with them through our undoubtedly synchronized series of winces. This is all after a far too lengthy opening credits sequence that needlessly summarized, in clips playing in frames in the webbing, everything that happened in the last two movies.

The soundtrack was heavy-handed and at times nearly absurd. During a scene where Peter triumphantly retrieves his suit from a luggage chest, I found myself incapable of determining whether the music sounded more like an African adventure or high-school graduation. Honestly, I expected more from Christopher Young, especially with such original soundtrack classics under his belt as Urban Legend, Hellraiser: Resurrection, The Core, The Grudge, Beauty Shop, and Ghost Rider. Someone needs to tell him that NOT EVERY SECOND OF THE FILM NEEDS TO HAVE MUSIC PLAYING, and that often, the contrasts between the presence and absence of music can have just as much impact as the musical composition in itself.

Peter becomes unintentionally hilarious after exposure to the black suit. He just gets so. Fucking. Emo. It’s like the black ooze was grease squeezed out of Morrissey’s hair after a bukakke fest with My Chemical Romance. Quoting Janet’s reaction in the theater, “my god! He’s become Fallout-of-windows Boy!” We couldn’t help but snicker whenever we saw his goofy eye liner. Another hilarious (though non emo-specific) scene is when he approaches Mary Jane on this bridge with a bouquet of flowers and tells her, “here, peonies” with an inflection that makes it sound like he’s saying “here, pee on these”.

The absolute cheesiest part, though – and I’m not sure if Sam Raimi did this ironically – is when Peter is swinging toward the final battle, and he briefly lands on a rooftop in front of an American flag the size of a goddamned skyscraper. That this happens nearly immediately after the “Peter graduates from high school” part of the soundtrack isn’t much help. The formulaic, telegraphed ending is nearly as cheesy, but this scene manages to narrow it out of the top spot simply with superfluous patriotism. It’s not like the Sandman was Osama Bin Laden, or Venom was reincarnated Hitler (though maybe Marvel can pull out a “What If…?” where they actually are), and it doesn’t necessarily matter that this is taking place in America, or that Peter Parker is an American citizen. It’s just goofy.

In all, it’s mostly a failure, topping off what had been until this a fantastic series with an empty, overblown shell of a film. I guess you can’t really expect much subtlety or nuance from an action film, but given the quality of the previous two, you know you can expect more than this. While it wasn’t entirely unenjoyable, to claim this movie was a disappointment would be one of the best things I could say about it.

Game review below the fold.
Continue reading