National Review: “We’re totally cool, right guys? Right? Please?” – Part II (11-20)

So, it turns out that Amanda from Pandagon has also done a breakdown of a random sampling of the Top Fifty. So check that out, if you haven’t already.

Jonathan Swift has put up his own personal (and quite funny) version of the list. I’d have included Pink Floyd’s anti-immigration, anti-gay-marriage-rights, anti-marijuana-legalization, pro-Second Amendment ballad “In the Flesh”:

Are there any queers in the theater tonight? / Get ‘em up against the wall. / There’s one in the spotlight, now he don’t look right to me. / Get ‘im up against the wall. / That one looks Jewish! / That one’s a coon! / Who let all this riff-raff into the room? / There’s one smoking a joint! / And another one’s got spots! / If I had my way, I’d have all of you shot!

But that’s just me. Anyway, on to songs 11 to 20:


11. “The Trees,” by Rush.

Before there was Rush Limbaugh, there was Rush, a Canadian band whose lyrics are often libertarian. What happens in a forest when equal rights become equal outcomes? “The trees are all kept equal / By hatchet, axe, and saw.”

Ah, Ayn Rand: Noblest and most socially responsible of all philosophers. I heard a great critique of Objectivism about five years ago, went something like: “If Ayn Rand was being raped, would she scream for help?”

It’s not that Libertarianism is bad, it’s that this particular kind of it is–this Ayn Randish, “every man for himself” bullshit idealism. So what’s wrong with this kind of Libertarianism? I’ll let Zompist provide the in-depth answer to that one.

I suppose if one applies the metaphor a little more literally, this could also be taken to VERY conservative extremes, in a “don’t hate us because our race/religion/etc. is better than yours” way.

The thing is, one could just as easily approach this song from a Harrison Bergeron (by Kurt Vonnegut) perspective, and interpret it as referring to individuals’ talents, abilities, intelligence, etc. Why does it have to always be about money and taxes? It takes a bit of a stretch of the metaphor to say “Oaks are the ones with more money, and Maples are the poor”.

Or, hell, I could even see this song applied to the “Evolution vs. Creationism” debate: The Oaks are professors and scientists who have gathered and repeatedly tested data and have a lot to stand on, whereas the Maples are proponents of creationism, bitching because their hypotheses aren’t seeing the light of day.

12. “Neighborhood Bully,” by Bob Dylan.

A pro-Israel song released in 1983, two years after the bombing of Iraq’s nuclear reactor, this ironic number could be a theme song for the Bush Doctrine: “He destroyed a bomb factory, nobody was glad / The bombs were meant for him / He was supposed to feel bad / He’s the neighborhood bully.”

On first reading, I mentally displaced a word and thought he said “this number” could be “an ironic theme song” for the Bush Administration, and it threw me. First, because with the song itself being ironic, I had to work through a kind of double-negative irony, and second because it would mean a conservative was using the term “irony” in an appropriate context, when usually the concept is about as foreign to them as Jacques Derrida giving a lecture on women’s equality in alternating Cantonese, Finnish and Aramaic to a colony of Martians.

In actuality, he says it’s “an ironic number” that “could be a theme song”, which is, well, wrong. I suppose it could work, if there was even a tiny scrap of evidence justifying the original intentions for going to war in Iraq. And don’t give me that bullshit about Poor Baby Bush, world out to get him. “What he gets he must pay for,” my ass. Has that mouthfuck ever had to suffer the consequences of any of his actions or decisions?

The lyrics, in their entirety, can be found here, by the way. I’m really not seeing “theme song for Bush” in there, and I think Dylan himself would agree.

Anyway, in my initial confusion, I started thinking about other ironic theme songs for the Bush Administration. Something more along the lines of, say, “Believe It or Not”, the theme song for “The Greatest American Hero”. Though, there are lines that are disturbingly fitting in a completely unironic way: “Suddenly I’m up on top of the world / it should’ve been somebody else,” for instance.

13. “My City Was Gone,” by The Pretenders.

Virtually every conservative knows the bass line, which supplies the theme music for Limbaugh’s radio show. But the lyrics also display a Jane Jacobs sensibility against central planning and a conservative’s dissatisfaction with rapid change: “I went back to Ohio / But my pretty countryside / Had been paved down the middle / By a government that had no pride.”

Wait a minute, this doesn’t make sense. Why would conservatives complain about a government that favors business over the environment?

“Sensibility against central planning”? What, like local governments never do shitty things? You know, larger government is better if for no other reason than the fact that, as easy as it is for organizations or wealthy individuals or groups to put local/state politicians in their pockets, it’s far more difficult to buy out the entire federal government. Now, I’ll concede that if one succeeds, the problem is much larger than it would be on a local level. But I digress.

Anyway, I can’t say for sure, but looking at the lyrics, I’m not seeing any references to “central planning”. In fact, the only direct reference to government at all is just that: “government”. This could technically even refer to the schoolboard, for fuck’s sake.

And she’s not so much talking about “rapid change” as she is talking about “changes that destroy things”. See, this is another completely arbitrary conservative fear: that things will not always be the same. Chances are, they’ll get better, but then they’d be different, and different is bad! There’s no utility to it, or applicability to reality–much llike many other facets of conservative ideology.

What would John say about global warming, a relatively slow-moving change (compared to bulldozing a city and putting in a mall) that’s linked conclusively to human-produced carbon in the atmosphere, which could be curbed but isn’t by the same prideless conservative government that, as described in the song, sides with business over the environment? Speaking of cities being gone… *cough* New Orleans *cough*

14. “Right Here, Right Now,” by Jesus Jones.

The words are vague, but they’re also about the fall of Communism and the end of the Cold War: “I was alive and I waited for this. . . . Watching the world wake up from history.”

And no liberals were at all happy that the Berlin Wall came down. There’s no such thing as a liberal! There are only Republicans and Communists!

And again, Communism as exhibited by Russia, China, et al is not the same as the economic philosophy. But Saddam wasn’t a Communist, yet Saddam committed similar atrocities to those perpetrated by the Communist regimes. But how could he, if it’s Communism that causes them? !?!?!?!?!

But we’ve already been through this.

15. “I Fought the Law,” by The Crickets.

The original law-and-order classic, made famous in 1965 by The Bobby Fuller Four and covered by just about everyone since then.

This song is absolutely in no way about rebellion.

Oh, right, and liberals don’t give a shit at all about punishing people for their crimes.

16. “Get Over It,” by The Eagles.

Against the culture of grievance: “The big, bad world doesn’t owe you a thing.” There’s also this nice line: “I’d like to find your inner child and kick its little ass.”

If the big, bad world doesn’t owe anyone a thing, then why do conservatives fuckin’ spend so much time bitching about the estate tax? Why do only poor people have to work to earn money? Heirs and heiresses should have to suffer the same fate, yet when they bitch about their poor, unfair lot in life, it’s seen as working for economic justice!

Fuck that. Whiny conservatives are worlds worse than even the whiniest of liberals, because at least the goddamned liberals have something to whine about more than “you mean I only get two of my daddy’s yachts!? That’s not fair! Death tax! Death tax! Rabble! Rabblerabble!”

17. “Stay Together for the Kids,” by Blink 182.

A eulogy for family values by an alt-rock band whose members were raised in a generation without enough of them: “So here’s your holiday / Hope you enjoy it this time / You gave it all away. . . . It’s not right.”

Yeah, your husband might beat the shit out of you, but you’d better stay together for the kids. Otherwise, the value of your family values is suspect. And if your spouse repeatedly cheats on you and humiliates you, that’s totally better for the kids than getting a divorce and ending an unhealthy relationship. Teaching your kids that they can change shitty situations in their lives is a horrible lesson! It’s better to instill in them a deep sense of shame for even considering the notion that they deserve better than to be treated in a degrading way.

Speaking as the child of now divorced parents who are much healthier, happier people apart from each other, I say fuck that.

18. “Cult of Personality,” by Living Colour.

A hard-rocking critique of state power, whacking Mussolini, Stalin, and even JFK: “I exploit you, still you love me / I tell you one and one makes three / I’m the cult of personality.”

Heh, wasn’t that phrase tossed around a bit in the last election? “Cult of personality”? Considering that one of the most important attributes possessed by Bush, according to the conservative voting constituency, was that he was the guy with whom they’d rather drink a beer, I don’t think there’s a lot of ground to stand on for using the term to criticize others.

Speaking of telling people that one and one makes three, what about all the misinformation that led us into war? What about when Bush called U.S. government bonds “worthless I.O.U.s” while trying to convince Americans to support his bullshit Social Security “fix”? Who the fuck is lying to whom, here?

Fortunately, it seems Bush is finally overreaching his ability to slick people over with his winning “down home country boy” bullshit pseudo-cowboy feigned charm.

19. “Kicks,” by Paul Revere and the Raiders.

An anti-drug song that is also anti-utopian: “Well, you think you’re gonna find yourself a little piece of paradise / But it ain’t happened yet, so girl you better think twice.”

Oh, heaven forbid humanity ever achieves utopia! What kind of liberal savage could ever hope for such a thing? (Which, of course, begs the question: Are conservatives actively working toward dystopia?)

And, wait a second, so now we’re not taking the book of Genesis literally? Will you people make up your fucking minds already?

20. “Rock the Casbah,” by The Clash.

After 9/11, American radio stations were urged not to play this 1982 song, one of the biggest hits by a seminal punk band, because it was seen as too provocative. Meanwhile, British Forces Broadcasting Service (the radio station for British troops serving in Iraq) has said that this is one of its most requested tunes.

I agree that banning (even if only through “urging”) songs is silly, especially considering the media coverage at the time: Would it really have mattered if we were reminded about the attack from a subtly tangible connection to a song’s theme or a particular interpretation of lyrics, or from being perpetually bombarded with the same two minutes of footage of explosions and falling towers dumped at us from everything capable of broadcasting video?

Though, I’m not exactly sure we should be using the tastes of troops in Iraq to determine the value of songs on our radio stations. (“We don’t need no water, let the motherfucker burn.” *shudder*)

In any event, if salivating over the idea of “Rocking” the “Casbah” is considered a conservative ideal, count me the fuck out.


Thus ends another installment of the Hip Conservative Fifty. 21 to 30 in the near future.

National Review: “We’re totally cool, right guys? Right? Please?” – Part I (1-10)

In which I do a song-by-song breakdown of the National Review’s list of the top fifty conservative rock songs of all time, ten songs at a time.

I’ll start with the writer’s own introduction:

Rockin’ the Right
by JOHN J. MILLER of National Review

On first glance, rock ‘n’ roll music isn’t very conservative. It doesn’t fare much better on second or third glance (or listen), either. Neil Young has a new song called “Let’s Impeach the President.” Last year, the Rolling Stones made news with “Sweet Neo Con,” another anti-Bush ditty. For conservatives who enjoy rock, it isn’t hard to agree with the opinion Johnny Cash expressed in “The One on the Right Is on the Left”: “Don’t go mixin’ politics with the folk songs of our land / Just work on harmony and diction / Play your banjo well / And if you have political convictions, keep them to yourself.” In other words: Shut up and sing.

Nobody but rock stars have ever mixed politics with art. Any kind of art should have no meaning or message whatsoever, but should just sort of have words, a tune, or general imagery. Subjects like admiring shoelaces, putting hats on hooks, sleeping and bananas are preferred, as long as metaphoric use is avoided.

Also, if this is how you feel, then why politicize rock songs with very stretched interpretations to fit with a conservative message? But whatever.

But some rock songs really are conservative — and there are more of them than you might think. Last year, I asked readers of National Review Online to nominate conservative rock songs. Hundreds of suggestions poured in. I’ve sifted through them all, downloaded scores of mp3s, and puzzled over a lot of lyrics. What follows is a list of the 50 greatest conservative rock songs of all time, as determined by me and a few others. The result is of course arbitrary, though we did apply a handful of criteria.

I guess some rock songs really are conservative, for very small values of “some”. Though, I suppose if Charlie Manson can interpret that an entire Beatles album was a message directed at him from angels, anyone can interpret lyrics as supporting any viewpoint or message. …You win this round, Mr. Miller.

What makes a great conservative rock song? The lyrics must convey a conservative idea or sentiment, such as skepticism of government or support for traditional values. And, to be sure, it must be a great rock song. We’re biased in favor of songs that are already popular, but have tossed in a few little-known gems. In several cases, the musicians are outspoken liberals. Others are notorious libertines. For the purposes of this list, however, we don’t hold any of this against them. Finally, it would have been easy to include half a dozen songs by both the Kinks and Rush, but we’ve made an effort to cast a wide net. Who ever said diversity isn’t a conservative principle?

Who ever said? The National Review did, actually, back when it opposed the Civil Rights movement.

Right, because liberals aren’t at all skeptical of the government, especially over the last six years. Good thing we have these conservatives around to champion the idea of questioning authority!

So here are NR’s top 50 conservative rock songs of all time. Go ahead and quibble with the rankings, complain about what we put on, and send us outraged letters and e-mails about what we left off. In the end, though, we hope you’ll admit that it’s a pretty cool playlist for your iPod.

1. “Won’t Get Fooled Again,” by The Who.

The conservative movement is full of disillusioned revolutionaries; this could be their theme song, an oath that swears off naive idealism once and for all. “There’s nothing in the streets / Looks any different to me / And the slogans are replaced, by-the-bye. . . . Meet the new boss / Same as the old boss.” The instantly recognizable synthesizer intro, Pete Townshend’s ringing guitar, Keith Moon’s pounding drums, and Roger Daltrey’s wailing vocals make this one of the most explosive rock anthems ever recorded — the best number by a big band, and a classic for conservatives.

Are you kidding me? If anything, this is an anthem against politics in general, addressing how whichever party is in power, they’re all politicians and not much ever really changes. I also like how he uses a “. . .” to skip right over the line: “And the parting on the left / Is now parting on the right”.

“[S]wears off naive idealism”, pfft. Which perspective is it, again, that thinks that all it takes to get teenagers to stop fucking is to tell them “don’t have sex”? Which perspective thinks that laws banning gay marriage will stop anal sex? Which perspective–conservative or liberal–wants to make laws that are based on the premise that humans are capable of perfect emotional and physiological self-control? This isn’t even “idealism”, it’s just completely out of touch with reality.

In any event, it takes about as much cognitive dissonance as the human mind is capable of producing to consider this song in any way “conservative”.

2. “Taxman,” by The Beatles.

A George Harrison masterpiece with a famous guitar riff (which was actually played by Paul McCartney): “If you drive a car, I’ll tax the street / If you try to sit, I’ll tax your seat / If you get too cold, I’ll tax the heat / If you take a walk, I’ll tax your feet.” The song closes with a humorous jab at death taxes: “Now my advice for those who die / Declare the pennies on your eyes.”

This one’s probably the biggest surprise on this list. Conservatives! Hating taxes! Well, I’ll be! And it’s number two on the list? Certainly there must have been a mistake!

Nobody likes taxes, but some of us are capable of coming to terms with notion of social responsibility. A lot of things in life suck, and if the worst you’ve got to whine about is taxes, consider yourself lucky. I wonder what the world would be like if conservatives turned their massive anti-tax attention and energy toward the multitude of things in this world that are far, far worse than taxes.

And, oh, yes, the “death tax” is such a horrible, horrible thing, because–gasp–heaven fuckin’ forbid we try to prevent the perpetuation of a permanent aristocracy! Why, it’s a direct affront to Paris Hilton (Long Live Paris Hilton) and Ivanka Trump (Long Live Ivanka Trump)!

3. “Sympathy for the Devil,” by The Rolling Stones.

Don’t be misled by the title; this song is The Screwtape Letters of rock. The devil is a tempter who leans hard on moral relativism — he will try to make you think that “every cop is a criminal / And all the sinners saints.” What’s more, he is the sinister inspiration for the cruelties of Bolshevism: “I stuck around St. Petersburg / When I saw it was a time for a change / Killed the czar and his ministers / Anastasia screamed in vain.”

Yeah, ’cause the Rolling Stones are totally a conservative band.

So what he’s saying is… we ought to filter the world into black and white moral absolutes, and questioning authority in any way is to be avoided. Got it. And, of course, the typical conservative brand of moral absolutism doesn’t really adopt a utilitarian perspective of harm and benefit; “moral” is “whatever makes me feel like the world is right”, and “immoral” is “anything I think is icky or bad”. So, for instance, it’s “moral” to cut taxes in the middle of a war, resulting in (among many other things) lack of funding for equipment for our troops, but it’s “immoral” for a man to fall in love with another man, even though it’s not hurting anyone else, let alone resulting in the exacerbation of injury of hundreds or thousands of soldiers.

It must be so, so easy to just walk through life knowing exactly what’s bad and exactly what’s good. Gosh… I wish I could have such a firm grasp of the difference between good and evil!

4. “Sweet Home Alabama,” by Lynyrd Skynyrd.

A tribute to the region of America that liberals love to loathe, taking a shot at Neil Young’s Canadian arrogance along the way: “A Southern man don’t need him around anyhow.”

I’ll let the Rude Pundit handle this one. When you politicize this song, it sure is a great one if you’re a racist! Other than that, it’s okay.

5. “Wouldn’t It Be Nice,” by The Beach Boys.
Pro-abstinence and pro-marriage: “Maybe if we think and wish and hope and pray it might come true / Baby then there wouldn’t be a single thing we couldn’t do / We could be married / And then we’d be happy.”

Meh. I’m not sure if one could really consider “pro-marriage” to be a “conservative” ideal. There are plenty of married liberals. In fact, there’d be a lot more if gay marriage were legal. In fact, I’d say that there are quite a number of liberals who are pro-marriage.

With regard to abstinence: Wouldn’t it be nice if kids emotions / weren’t addled by floods of hormones / and wouldn’t it be nice if everybody / didn’t have impulses of their own

Talk about idealism. Yeah, wouldn’t it be nice? Wouldn’t it be nice if we didn’t have teen pregnancies? Wouldn’t it be nice if we weren’t mammals and were, thus, unaffected by sexual desires? Wouldn’t it be nice if we weren’t comprised of meat and chemicals and electricity and could think logically without all the weird organic interactions? Wouldn’t it be nice if candy and blowjobs grew on houseplants, and people shat rainbows that smelled like chocolate and raspberry? Wouldn’t it be nice if people could get the same sensations and pleasures from not having sex?

6. “Gloria,” by U2.

Just because a rock song is about faith doesn’t mean that it’s conservative. But what about a rock song that’s about faith and whose chorus is in Latin? That’s beautifully reactionary: “Gloria / In te domine / Gloria / Exultate.”

Them damned lib’rul elitists certainly don’t know or appreciate Latin, that’s for damned sure!

As secular as I try to be, I have a profound appreciation for religious music. And, uh, by the way, there are plenty of liberals who believe in God. They just believe in the kind and loving version of Jesus–the one who cared about the poor–and not the vindictive one who hated gays.

7. “Revolution,” by The Beatles.

“You say you want a revolution / Well you know / We all want to change the world . . . Don’t you know you can count me out?” What’s more, Communism isn’t even cool: “If you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao / You ain’t going to make it with anyone anyhow.” (Someone tell the Che Guevara crowd.)

Change is bad, and is to be avoided at all costs.

No, John, fascism isn’t cool. The ideals of Communism as a philosophy aspire toward the same utopian goals as any other political or economic philosophy. Anything can become corrupted. Put Capitalism into the same hands and you’ll have the same result. Communism just happens to be more prone to corruption. But it’s the corruption that’s the problem.

The problem with the conservative perspective on Communism is that atrocities committed by fascist regimes in countries that claim to employ a “Communist” economic policy are conflated with Communism itself. It’s not the economic philosophy that’s causing the murders and executions–and I defy anyone to find instructions for these things in the Communist Manifesto–it’s the fascist regime itself. One could just as easily establish a country with a Capitalist economic philosophy and murder people en masse.

If you can’t tell the difference, stay the fuck out of political discourse.

8. “Bodies,” by The Sex Pistols.

Violent and vulgar, but also a searing anti-abortion anthem by the quintessential punk band: “It’s not an animal / It’s an abortion.”

Nobody likes abortion. It’s a difficult decision, and people are often haunted by The Baby That Might Have Been. But sometimes people have no other choice.

Conservatives are too focused on the notion that women have abortions, and completely ignore why women have abortions. From the studies I’ve seen, it’s usually due to financial unsurety. Even going through a pregnancy can be enough to impoverish a family. Sometimes it’s done “for the greater good”, for lack of a better term. You’d think that people so willing to send troops into a war overseas would understand that.

9. “Don’t Tread on Me,” by Metallica.
A head-banging tribute to the doctrine of peace through strength, written in response to the first Gulf War: “So be it / Threaten no more / To secure peace is to prepare for war.”

Oh, yes, Metallica: Champions of liberty and justice for all, and warriors for the working man. Which is why Lars has to sue his fans–families deep in credit card debt with two incomes who can barely afford to eat and pay the bills, let alone spend twenty bucks on a CD, but still want to be able to listen to music to try to escape the crushing feeling that has become living–so that he can gold-plate his swimming pool and so the group’s record company’s executives can hoard even more money they don’t deserve that they’ve milked from the people who actually have talent. But I digress.

I’m not really sure if I’d call the line “to secure peace is to prepare for war” a tribute to the doctrine of peace through strength. But whatever. Hooray for nationalism, or something.

10. “20th Century Man,” by The Kinks.

“You keep all your smart modern writers / Give me William Shakespeare / You keep all your smart modern painters / I’ll take Rembrandt, Titian, da Vinci, and Gainsborough. . . . I was born in a welfare state / Ruled by bureaucracy / Controlled by civil servants / And people dressed in grey / Got no privacy got no liberty / ’Cause the 20th-century people / Took it all away from me.”

Wait, this is supposed to be a conservative song? “Got no privacy got no liberty”? Um, NSA wiretaps? Trying to criminalize butt-sex? An FBI task force to try to get rid of “obscene” material from the Internet? Fuck, people can’t even enjoy TV shows in the privacy of their own homes because of conservative fundamentalists protesting and calling the networks. Who cares if there was anyone who enjoyed, say, “The Book of Daniel”? They don’t get to! They don’t have that right, because it makes ME mad that such a show exists! Even though I don’t actually watch it and would never have heard about it unless someone else told me to be outraged!

Yet, right, these are all crimes of the liberals, out to take away everyone’s freedom and privacy! This song isn’t a criticism of government and bureaucracy in general at all!

(Some of the other lyrics: “Don’t wanna get myself shot down / By some trigger happy policeman” (I thought in one of the songs mentioned above that it was wrong to question authority); “The wonderful world of technology, Napalm hydrogen bombs biological warfare”.)

And no liberals–especially none-a them damned college-goin’ or book-learnin’ elitists–have any appreciation for Rembrandt or Shakespeare or daVinci.


This whole endeavor smacks of a desperate attempt to seem cool, when the fact is that most music–specifically rock–just isn’t conservative. Most art isn’t conservative. And trying to twist interpretations to make it seem otherwise just seems pathetic and artificial, and a little desperate.

Ten more songs in a future update. Stay tuned.

Word of the Day

illegal (il.le.gal) adj.

Etymology: Middle French or Medieval Latin; Middle French illegal, from Medieval Latin illegalis, from Latin in- + legalis legal

1. Anything that is wrong for you to do, but okay for a police officer to do because he/she has lights on his/her car and a gun. (Example: “The police officer drove the wrong way on Waterman, a one-way street in Providence, but it was not illegal because he had a gun and a hat with a star on it.)

See also: My essay on police chases. Safety? Pfft!

A Hand Job

Figured I’d share this with you all, as I’ve been a little inspired lately:



I find I’m far more comfortable working with pen or pencil and scanning it in to Photoshop for coloring than I am doing either all-Photoshop or all-paper media work. I don’t have the control and precision I need with a WACOM tablet when I can’t directly see where I’m putting the pen, but I’m a huge fan of the undo feature and the color manipulation available if I end up picking the wrong color. Plus, layers are awesome.

Note to Alec: Sorry; I’ll get another ‘Hitler’ out soon, I promise.

Advice for Recent or Upcoming Art School Graduates Questioning Themselves and Their Career Choices

(Specifically in the arts, since I initially wrote this in response to a specific person’s feelings of dissatisfaction and lack of enjoyment as an illustration major as graduation approaches. Janet, too, has been feeling depressed about similar things, and I figure this is probably a rather widespread trend. The post to which this is a response can be found here. I’m editing this a little to make it more generalized, and most of it does apply to more than just art school.)


You’ve spent the last four years of your lives dedicating yourselves to refining your skills in a particular field, and now that your time in college is ending, you’re wondering if you’ve made the right decisions. Well, if not this, what do you think you would do? What occupation would make you happy? By choosing a degree in the arts, you’re adding a bit to the steepness in the uphill battle of finding a reasonable and acceptable job, but if this is the career that will make you happy, you shouldn’t let anything discourage you from at least trying. I’m not really sure you’d be any happier giving up on art and pursuing a career in (read: resigning yourself to) some dead-end office job, or something that doesn’t interest you, or something you’d have to go through another four years of college to do.

In your senior year, specifically the latter half, you’re given more insight into your career of choice, and many of you are finding it falls short of the fantasy world it had been depicted to be. This is supposed to be part of the test, I’d imagine: You’re made aware of how much it all sucks, and you have to overcome it in order to have the motivation to succeed enough to get a job. Think of how many other students are saying and thinking the same things you are right now. I wonder how many will be fully crushed by the feelings, and how many will push through them. This is probably the part of the process that weeds out most of the graduates.

Hell, after all, look around you: You don’t think that all of these people are going to become successful, do you? You’d better hope they don’t, ’cause that means less opportunity for you. It’s a shitty way to think, but that’s how they’ve trained us. You can’t have both humanity-wide prosperity AND personal prosperity in the system of American (particularly neoconservative) Capitalism. There will always be class differences because of human nature, but Capitalism is really the only economic system that openly embraces class differentiation instead of doing its best to alleviate it.

Anyway, part of what you’re feeling is a really large-scale Buyer’s Remorse. Truth is, college is a rip-off. Part of the problem comes from the business world viewing college as something entirely different from what it actually is. They see it as a token–”Do you have a degree?” instead of “What did you actually learn?”–and not as an institution for specialized education.

Look at all the things humanity has accompished in the past without everyone being required to get a degree. Of course, the whole thing would be different if it wasn’t something that was “required” in order to get a job, or if everyone could go for free, but the truth is, it’s just another of the many goods and services available to us Cattle Consumers, only this time it’s something that’s becoming mandatory in the Pursuit of Happiness. It’s not legally required, of course, like car insurance and other bullshit “services” you’re legally bound to consume, but in most cases, it’s kind of a societal law that’s enforced by punishment from the world of business. (a.k.a. You live in a box and go hungry.)

I’m almost surprised that companies don’t require you purchase other things as requisites for employment as well. A case could be made that many enriching and educational things out there would make a person a better employee. “Candidate will have purchased the following, and must provide receipts as proof of purchase.” After all, that’s pretty much what a degree is: A large-assed receipt you can hang on your wall. “Hey, world, I bought this. Give me a job.”

Sorry, I know this isn’t exactly motivating, but it relates to this aforementioned “fantasy world” painted for us by colleges and the business world. I think every school does it, because if they didn’t, they wouldn’t make money. If they didn’t instill in you this fantasy world of getting a wonderful job and living in a fantastic apartment overlooking Central Park and all this other bullshit, you wouldn’t be as inclined to continue on to graduation. It’s a little like Scientology that way: They’re not going to tell you it’s all a bunch of crazy shit about an alien strapping people to volcanoes until you’re in about $200,000. Why would you keep paying if they told you that up front?

What’s funny is that, well, the jobs many people are getting now with a degree are the same jobs our parents got without being required to go to college. (How, oh, how did we ever make it this far without it?) Not all of them ended up liking what they were doing, and having a College Receipt won’t exactly change that for anyone in our generation. Thanks to the poor economic management of this administration, that we’re actually starting to feel some of the more significant effects of that: As the job market shrinks, it begins to eliminate the difference between the jobs people with degrees can get, and the jobs people without them can get. There are a lot of college graduates nowadays doing data entry and working at Starbucks.

The truth is, you’re absolutely right–the world doesn’t deserve your art. Humanity doesn’t deserve the honor of seeing that piece of you, that thing you created and poured so much of yourself into. Nearly all of them should be ashamed. But unless we’re fond of starving or being miserable, we all have to whore out at least some of the skills and talents we have. No, this society isn’t necessarily worthy of them, but we have no choice. And in doing so, we can hope to maybe make society something that is worthy, that will appreciate what we’re carving out of ourselves for them.

But you have no hope of accomplishing that by giving up on yourself.


Brief Addendum: For the record, I have no issue with college as an institution for learning. I understand its value, I just strongly believe that it’s viewed for the most part as something it’s not. More on this, possibly, in a future essay.

SPAM SPAM SPAM

I wonder how much time is wasted on the whole if you were to combine all the hours people spend weeding spam out of things. I think we should all file a class action lawsuit for compensation. Sometimes I feel like I’m a goddamned part-time ad executive rejecting unsolicited submissions. Were it possible for an individual to actually track these people down and prosecute them, I’d hang something like the following somewhere on the site and go after them to collect:

ENTER THE JABBERRWOCK DOT COM (hereafter ‘we’/'me’/'us’) DOES NOT ACCEPT UNSOLICITED ADVERTISEMENTS. By submitting an advertisement to this site via the comments, you are agreeing to compensate me for my time spent removing it, to total no less than $2.00 USD per submission. (One ‘submission’ is considered one comment post that offers a product or service either through one or more links or through the URI link provided on the comment form.)

Payments will be expected within thirty (30) days from the time of your submission. If you are not timely with your payment and miss the deadline, your balance will be sold to a third-party debt collector.

You know, THIS is something the telecommunications companies could be working on, instead of trying to fuck everyone over. How much do you think they could save in bandwidth were spam outlawed? They could make more money and not piss off just about everyone in the country at the same time!

Marah-jah-wanna

I’m Josh Crowley, and I approve This Message.

And this post is excellent, though many of you have probably already seen it. Figure I’d mention it, though.

Also, there’s this thing about lowering the price of software if a bunch of people mention MacZot. So I mentioned it, and hopefully it helps.

Quick, random thought: How come people are always fucking under sheets on TV and in some movies? I understand it’s TV and movies, and we have this immature, dipshit Censorship Society with stunted sexuality, but it’s just totally unrealistic and I’m surprised it’s tolerated. “Let’s have sex, but let’s be sure not to have any part of our nudity visible.” It’s like if they showed a family dinner, but everyone was eating with toy robots and dildos instead of forks and knives.

Speaking Voices

Ben: tony blair is on cspan2 right now. he weirdly looks more and more like bush as time goes on.
EtJabberwock: Mmm.
Ben: I think it’s because their hair colors are roughly the same. or something.
Ben: well, and they both look sort of simian, though in slightly different ways.
Ben: I can actually stand to hear blair speak, though. that’s a difference.
EtJabberwock: Yeah, that’s something, I guess. At least he doesn’t have that raspy, shit-toothed, fake-southern, word-garbling sound-vomit tumbling out of his mouth like elephant feces.
EtJabberwock: Blair’s is more refined, like a scarab beetle wiping a stream of shit across a pair of tea-soaked silk panties.

CEO Income Report

It’s a little surprising that This Report is coming from Forbes.

Glad they’re catching up with the same shit we on the left have been saying for the last decade or so. I know I could probably dig up a post of mine from a few years ago that says nearly exactly the same thing, only with a lot higher a saturation level of words like “disgusting” and “appalling” and “assholes”.

I’m a little surprised, though: They claim that the rise from 40 to over 400 times the average employee’s income has occurred over the last 25 years–I was under the impression the span was longer than that, starting in about the late 1960s or early 1970s. Heh, kind of disturbing that things are actually worse than I thought.